🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.