🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

Another senior Democratic figure said the court had once again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.