🔗 Share this article

Ouch. On one hand, Australia's protracted campaign to organize the Cop31 next year has ended in clear failure.

The effort ran for more than three years for the rights to host the world's biggest environmental conference and green trade fair, which would have brought tens of thousands of people to the city of Adelaide next fall.

This won't occur. Rather, the summit known as the UN climate meeting is headed to the tourist destination of Antalya, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey.

Letdown and Mixed Messages

This outcome will be a major let down to many people who had believed organizing the climate carnival could help accelerate Australia's shift from being a carbon-based economy to a clean energy leader, and bring global attention to the survival crisis facing Pacific island nations, who would have been co-hosts.

The procedure that led to failure has been an unclear situation. Recently, there have been doubts that the prime minister and other high-ranking officials really wanted the bid to be approved. His statements were ambiguous at best. This led to stories in the Australian and international media saying the administration was walking away.

This differed from the message being conveyed at the Cop30 talks in the Brazilian city, where the environment minister, the climate minister, had just declared the country was "fully committed to success".

Ambiguous backing is a recurring problem for the hosting proposal. Although the minister supported it, other high-level figures of the government have only sometimes appeared to care.

DFAT, traditionally responsible for global environmental talks, has been uninvolved and at times outright opposed.

There is little sign Albanese has considered UN climate conferences a priority. He has missed one since becoming prime minister in 2022. It's uncertain, but some will wonder if more could have been done to get the bid over the line.

A Different Perspective

That's the negative take. But there is another way to consider it.

Considering the Cop30 talks this week in South America – and from an international perspective – the decision on this week may, perversely, have been the most favorable outcome available.

Bowen set out on that day an unprecedented deal that he was developing with his colleague from Turkey, the Turkish minister. The Turkish government would be the conference leader, organizer and primary coordinator, and Australia – Bowen himself – would assume a role as "president of negotiations", managing almost all nations on the stuff that the nations actually attend for – the talks on how to together combat the environmental emergency.

Additionally, there would be a increased emphasis on the Pacific region, including a lead-up event on an Pacific island.

Reasons for Doubt

There are plenty of grounds for doubt. Turkey and Australia do not have a close relationship. Specific aspects of the agreement had not been finalized at the time of writing. The entire arrangement could fall over before it begins.

But it could also be a way to salvage something useful from what looked like an impending disaster for the international cooperation on global warming.

The Turkish government is widely seen in the international community as having been determined on causing havoc in the UN climate process. The system is supposed to work by consensus. Typically, that means if there are multiple countries in the competition those with weaker backing either bow out voluntarily, or a compromise is quietly done to persuade them to step aside.

The Turkish bid plainly had weaker endorsement than Australia and Pacific islands to host Cop31. At least 24 of the 28 countries responsible for selecting next year's venue had backed the southern pitch.

However, exceptionally, Ankara refused to yield. The term "disruption" has been used frequently in recent days, and not just by Australians.

International Dynamics

Turkey's obstinacy can be interpreted as a reflection of the fracturing geopolitical climate. With the US absent under Donald Trump, there has been no major power with the heft to confront the petroleum exporters that provided the Turks with some cover.

President Erdoğan is considered aligned with Vladimir Putin. Several nations worried about a conference obstructed from the top if his government led the negotiations. Germany did not want to have to organize an unprepared Cop31 at the UN environmental office in the German city, which is what would have happened under UN rules if the stalemate wasn't broken.

A Creative Solution

A path through was needed. International frameworks is imperfect and often unsettling to observe, but multilateral action has empirically had an impact in the battle with global heating. This joint approach is a creative idea that maintains progress when it is most crucial.

Notwithstanding reasonable concerns of the Australian government over its contradictory stance for expanding fossil fuel exports, climate activists who attend international meetings see Bowen as a positive influence in the talks. He has been requested to co-chair negotiation streams at each of the four conferences he has participated in.

This is significant. While some have dismissed the importance of a "chief negotiator", specialists from research centers and veteran observers at environmental negotiations assert it is pivotal to their positive outcome.

"Every successful Cop has been shaped by a president directing proceedings who can listen, forge agreement and deliver an significant result. This occurred in Berlin in 1995, in the Mexican resort in 2010 and Paris in 2015. We saw the opposite in the Danish city in 2009," he says. "This position is critical at the Cop except for making sure that delegates are fed."

Remaining Concerns

Multiple unanswered questions. As an illustration, civil society is essential at environmental summits. What, if anything, can the Australian government do to stop a restriction on civil society by the Turkish leadership?

Possibly little. However, this doesn't prevent this arrangement appearing as the most promising opportunity possible to have a conference that may provide benefits for the Pacific, Australia and the global community. It's worth a try.